Cases 121 - 130 of 12,435
HUGHES v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv02573
Defendant:
JEFFREY BASCOMB, OFFICERS NOT LISTED AND NURSE AT PDU, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
TAHVON HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTIAGO v. PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 et al
as 2:2024cv02484
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 and BNI AGENT JOHN/JANE DOE 1 - 10
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burroughs v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Burroughs
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
PAGE v. PRIORE et al
as 2:2024cv02462
Defendant:
CHIEF PATRICK PRIORE, HOME DEPOT, BRIAN VITKO and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE PAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO v. EVANS et al
as 5:2024cv02378
Defendant:
ROBERT STETVOID, DIANE BAIL BONDS, JENNA MARIE FLISZAR and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zierke v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00919
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Gary Zierke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
NASH v. PHILA DISTRICT ATTY et al
as 2:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
AASIM NASH
Defendant:
PHILA PUB. DEF., NEW VITAE DR. BEHR and PHILA DISTRICT ATTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARRATT v. HALL et al
as 2:2024cv02348
Defendant:
RASHEEN KNOX, MALIK LIVERPOOL and RAHEEN HALL
Plaintiff:
JAVINE BARRATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Youmans v. Nickolas et al
as 3:2024cv00898
Defendant:
Ms. Lampert, Ms. Murray, Deborah Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Youmans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
