Cases 131 - 140 of 654
RUTLEDGE v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2021cv00393
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RAY RUTLEDGE
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diarra v. United States Government et al
as 1:2021cv03849
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
United States Government and State of Georgia Governor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELLING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 6:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Snelling, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Georgia Department of Correction and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. Owens et al
as 1:2021cv03600
Plaintiff:
Frederick Woodard
Defendant:
Craig Owens and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. MELTON et al
as 1:2021cv00155
Plaintiff:
KRISTAL CHEYANNE WALKER
Defendant:
SHERIFF MARK MCHON, ADAM BELL, APPLING COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dinkins v. Grady Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv03129
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Dinkins
Defendant:
Grady Hospital, FBOP, USP ATL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Herrera Guzman v. Gadson et al
as 1:2021cv03135
Plaintiff:
Jose Salvador Herrera Guzman
Defendant:
Patsy Gadson, Gwinnett Co. Superior Court and District Attorney State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELLING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2021cv00101
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and DEPUTY WARDEN JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. PETTY et al
as 5:2021cv00209
Defendant:
JUDGE AMANDA S PETTY, BALDWIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, TONY MAY and others
Plaintiff:
CASEY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv02167
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Jail, State of Georgia and Gwinnett County
Plaintiff:
Quinton A. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
