Cases 161 - 170 of 3,037
Blango v. Luddivico et al
as 3:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Blango
Defendant:
Luddivico, Connection, Inc., Courtney Ring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Yu et al
as 3:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
K'waun Cole
Defendant:
Yu, Stone and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bidone v. United States et al
as 3:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Mandel Bidone
Defendant:
United States, Yale New Haven Inc., State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Milner v. Lupis et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Shawn Milner
Defendant:
Lupis, Jericka Baez, Holly Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vicente v. Wiggins et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Luis Vicente
Defendant:
Wiggins, Dougherty, Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
United States District Court and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez-Delgado v. Watson et al
as 3:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lopez-Delgado
Defendant:
Watson, Nunez, Reis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipper v. Green et al
as 3:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Whipper
Defendant:
Green, Roach, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. Olson et al
as 3:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Victor Arroyo
Defendant:
Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Russel Mechling v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF RUSSELL MECHLING, BY ITS EXECUTOR ELLEN ULMER and Estate of Russel Mechling
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
