Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Clark v. Cole et al
as 5:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Anthony Raymone Clark
Defendant:
FNU Cole and Kevin Stitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cys v. Cook et al
as 6:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Cys
Defendant:
FNU Cook, Dr. Patchin and FNU Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnett v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Joshua C Arnett
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, David W Prater, Cameron M Burwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Tulsa County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Tulsa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Doe
as 5:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Clark
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Ritchie et al
as 6:2022cv00034
Defendant:
Ralph Montula, Jason Ritchie, Amber Poindexter and others
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Clark and Michael Paul Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Unnamed Prison Guard/Van Driver
as 6:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Clark
Defendant:
Unnamed Prison Guard/Van Driver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Garfield County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2021cv00443
Defendant:
Garfield County Detention Facility, Daylon Rivers and Ben Crooks
Plaintiff:
Newton John Left-Hand Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Courtney v. Clark et al
as 6:2020cv00420
Plaintiff:
Tracy Errol Courtney, Trayc Courtney and Trayc E. Courtney
Defendant:
McClellan, James Gainer, Meredith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
