Cases 11 - 20 of 24
GOODE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv05040
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardona v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Jose Cristobal Cardona
Defendant:
B.A. Bledsoe, D. Young, D. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Serrano v. Hoffa et al
as 3:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Candido Serrano
Defendant:
S Hoffa, S Argueta, E Good and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Ruquet et al
as 3:2012cv01960
Plaintiff:
Equan Anwar Jones
Defendant:
Herbert Ruquet, John Beitman, Dominick DeRose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ruquet et al
as 3:2012cv01961
Plaintiff:
Equan Anwar Jones
Defendant:
Herbert Ruquet, John Beitman, Steve Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. DeRose et al
as 3:2012cv00570
Plaintiff:
Equan Anwar Jones and Bradly James Gwin
Defendant:
Dominick DeRose and Tim Good
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pope v. Edinger et al
as 1:2011cv01608
Plaintiff:
Irvin Lee Pope
Defendant:
Matt Edinger, J Flemming, D Archey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell v. Dauphin County Commissioners et al
as 1:2011cv01240
Plaintiff:
Victor Lloyd Mitchell
Defendant:
Dauphin County Commissioners, Jeffrey T. Haste, Michael Pries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyce v. DeRose et al
as 1:2010cv00460
Plaintiff:
James R. Boyce
Defendant:
Dominick DeRose, Michael Foreman, Tom Tolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DORSEY v. DAUB et al
as 2:2009cv03879
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DORSEY
Defendant:
CYNTHIA L. DAUB, JEFFREY A. BEARD, DAVID GOODE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
