Cases 11 - 20 of 76
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFarland v. Cobb County Government et al
as 1:2022cv03494
Plaintiff:
Chance McFarland and Catherine
Defendant:
Cobb County Government, State of Georgia Government, Cobb County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lusk v. Gwinnett County Police Department Agency et al
as 1:2022cv01739
Plaintiff:
Justice Robert Lusk
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Police Department Agency, Chief Thomas Doran, Officer D.A. Loomis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00243
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Robert Toole, Johnny Sikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. AIKENS et al
as 5:2021cv00215
Defendant:
DOCTOR AIKENS, DOCTOR LANE ULRICH and MEDICAL DIRECTOR JENNIFER MASON
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Williamson et al
as 3:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Mr. Horne, Cpt. Faison, Ms. Harold and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fairley v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv00063
Defendant:
District Attorney Jennifer Scalia, Judge Smith and Sheriff Freeman
Plaintiff:
Shelby LaTroy Fairley, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Newton County District Attorney Office et al
as 1:2021cv00583
Defendant:
Jennifer F. Arndt, Anthony Carter, Amber Benett and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Opollion Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
