Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Ettienne Modeste v. Hillsborough County Sheriff Dpt. et al
as 1:2021cv21017
Plaintiff:
Dexter Ettienne Modeste, Jr.
Defendant:
Falkenburg County Jail, Hillsborough County Sheriff Dpt., John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2021cv14021
Plaintiff:
De Javar C. Davis
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis-Bey v. Pooler et al
as 1:2020cv24967
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Judge Teresa Pooler and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Inch et al
as 9:2020cv81071
Defendant:
Francisco Acosta, Sargeant John Doe #3, SGT. Salmon and others
Plaintiff:
Ottis Lee Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bermudez v. City of West Palm Beach et al
as 9:2020cv80765
Defendant:
City of West Palm Beach, Sheriff Department of West Palm Beach FL, Officer John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Narciso Rosales Bermudez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borroto v. Lees et al
as 6:2019cv00851
Defendant:
John Doe 9, Peter Crank, Lees Eid and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Armas Borroto, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allgood v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv21095
Defendant:
John Doe # 5, Sgt Moss, John Doe # 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Allgood, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv24662
Plaintiff:
Bernard Moore and Derrick Miller
Defendant:
United States of America, Miami Dade County, City of Miami and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maskevich v. Ivey et al
as 6:2017cv01626
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Maskevich
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, Thomas Walter, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Lockett et al
as 5:2017cv00324
Plaintiff:
Gordon C. Reid
Defendant:
FNU Lockett, FNU Taylor, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
