Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Carmichael v. Kent
as 2:2010cv02857
Plaintiff:
Johnny Carmichael
Defendant:
Mac Kent
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Blount County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2010cv02855
Plaintiff:
Markus O'Shea Payne
Defendant:
Blount County Correctional Facility, R M Kent, Grace Yancey and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Adams et al
as 2:2009cv02584
Plaintiff:
Bryant Bernard Evans
Defendant:
Anne-Marie Adams, Ronald Harris and Brandon Kent Falls
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Blount County Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv01874
Plaintiff:
John T Price
Defendant:
Blount County Corrections, Kent and Hutchison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flavor v. Arrington et al
as 2:2009cv01079
Plaintiff:
Kidron Israel Flavor
Defendant:
Loyd Arrington, Mack Kent, Norred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adamson v. Hawkins et al
as 2:2009cv00877
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Plaintiff:
Charles Glenn Adamson
Defendant:
Hawkins, Mark Staton, Mack Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordar v. Morton et al
as 2:2008cv01717
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Cordar
Defendant:
Danny Morton, Wess Neil, R Mack Kent and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reed v. Morton et al
as 2:2008cv01532
Plaintiff:
Roy Joseph William Reed
Defendant:
Danny Morton, Wes Neil, Mack Kent and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Flavor v. Blount County Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv01211
Plaintiff:
Kidron I. Flavor
Defendant:
Blount County Corrections, Mack Kent, McCullough and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marks v. Marshall et al
as 2:2008cv00045
Plaintiff:
Keith Lydell Marks
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Mack Kent, Tammy Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
