Cases 11 - 20 of 196
Johnson v. Parks et al
as 3:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lee Johnson, II
Defendant:
Capt. Parks, Deputy Bull, Deputy Talalemotu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rarrick v. Kaber et al
as 1:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Rarrick
Defendant:
Sheriff Chris Kaber, Klamath County Jail Medical Contractors et al, Klamath County Community Corrections Parole/Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erskine v. O.S.H. Superintendant et al
as 6:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Erskine
Defendant:
O.S.H. Superintendant, O.S.P. Superintendant, Michael Fagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Young et al
as 3:2021cv01896
Plaintiff:
George Lee Marshall, Jr.
Defendant:
Stuart Young, Roger Haefer, S. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick v. Hendrix
as 3:2021cv01601
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Patrick
Defendant:
DeWayne Hendrix and FCI Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Reid et al
as 3:2021cv01404
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jerald Lee
Defendant:
Reid, Lloyd, Emmiet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Reese et al
as 3:2021cv01386
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jerald Lee
Defendant:
Sheriff Michael Reese, Facility Commander Wheeler, Captain Diamond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Brown et al
as 3:2021cv01321
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jerald Lee
Defendant:
Superintendent Nichole Brown, Blix, Lt. Balmesada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Dyke
as 3:2021cv01245
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jerald Lee
Defendant:
Dyke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
