Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Mathis v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv02441
Plaintiff:
Robert Mathis
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Paul L. Howard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. GA Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv02284
Plaintiff:
James E. Harris, Jamall D. Mathis, Antonio Battle and others
Defendant:
GA Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Lawson et al
as 1:2012cv01270
Plaintiff:
Jamall Mathis
Defendant:
Lawson, Tyasia Jones, Mike Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Fulton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2010cv01845
Plaintiff:
Willie James Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Fulton County Sheriff, Atlanta Judicial Circuit, City of Atlanta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2010cv01844
Plaintiff:
Willie James Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Judicial Circuit, Fulton County Law Library and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Atlanta Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2010cv01843
Plaintiff:
Willie James Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Atlanta Judicial Circuit, City of Atlanta, Georgia Public Defender Standards Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Blackshear Family Practice et al
as 5:2010cv00041
Plaintiff:
Larry Dwayne Smith
Defendant:
Blackshear Family Practice, Scott Mathis and Ware County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Georgia Diagnostic Classification Prison et al
as 1:2008cv03007
Plaintiff:
Doney P. Mathis
Defendant:
Georgia Diagnostic Classification Prison and Hilton Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Norton et al
as 7:2007cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Mathis
Defendant:
Nick Norton, Charles Norton, Cathy Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
