Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Sanchez et al v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2018cv04200
Plaintiff:
Pierre Sanchez
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Mr. Muscarella, District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ison v. Presley et al
as 1:2018cv06157
Defendant:
Grievance Clerk Padmore, ADA Preesley, Warden RNDC NYCDOCS and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinero v. 7th Precent Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv04698
Plaintiff:
Nelson Pinero
Defendant:
7th Precent Police Dept. and Pierre Burbran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Nassau County et al
as 2:2017cv07335
Defendant:
County of Nassau and Nassau County Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Pierre Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierre v. Nassau County et al
as 2:2017cv06629
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Robert Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05591
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-4, New York Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Whillheim et al
as 1:2017cv05793
Plaintiff:
Kent Davis
Defendant:
Erica Whillheim, Cynthia Arreola, Amy B. Milano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Whillheim et al
as 1:2017cv05383
Plaintiff:
Kent Davis
Defendant:
Erica Whillheim, Cynthia Arreola, Amy B. Milano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre-Louis v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2017cv03762
Defendant:
Richard Ambro, Martin I. Efman, Robert Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Harrison Pierre-Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pierre v. McAndrew et al
as 6:2016cv06006
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Pierre
Defendant:
McAndrew, Kerns, Supervising Physician and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
