Cases 11 - 20 of 118
Crowe v. United States
as 1:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Tyrecus J. Crowe
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Morel v. Department of Justice et al
as 7:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Lenin Morel
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thompson v. Marcum et al
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Mario Lamarr Thompson
Defendant:
Hack Marcum, Southern Health Partners, Desiree, Jail Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudisill v. United States of America
as 0:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Rudisill
Defendant:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curtis v. Mnuchin et al
as 0:2021cv00072
Plaintiff:
Tori Toni Curtis
Defendant:
Steven Terner Mnuchin, Charles P. Rettig and United States Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. United States District of Kentucky
as 0:2021cv00007
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Underwood, Jr.
Defendant:
United States District of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Daugherty v. The United States et al
as 5:2021cv00015
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky, The United States, Cabinet for Health and Family Services and others
Plaintiff:
Gina Y. Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kraus v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2020cv00191
Defendant:
Livingston County, Kentucky, Kentucky Court of Appeals, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Karl Kraus, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borden v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jason Dean Borden
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jabbi v. United States Marshal Service
as 5:2020cv00338
Plaintiff:
Abdourahman Jabbi
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
