Cases 221 - 230 of 3,346
BOLIN v. GARLAND
as 1:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. BOLIN
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER-EVANS v. FAUST et al
as 1:2022cv00584
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EVANS-MILLER
Defendant:
TOM FAUST and WANDA PATTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATTLETON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. GARLAND
as 1:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
ANDREW COX
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANNARELLA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CANNARELLA
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SOMERSET UNION COUNTIES, PROSECUTORS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. MAYOR(S) OF WASHINGTON, DC
as 1:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant:
MAYOR(S) OF WASHINGTON, DC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHEXNAYDER et al v. DIRECTOR OF F.B.O.P. et al
as 1:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
ASHDON SCHEXNAYDER and ANTONIO CRAWFORD
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF F.B.O.P. and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO CRAWFORD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL and UNKNOWN NAMED TRUST FUND SUPERVISOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and MEDICAL STAFF FOR THE BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
