Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Carl v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2018cv00097
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Defendant:
Camille L. Neider, FNU Wright, Shawn Condie and others
Plaintiff:
Shane R. Carl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Gillespie et al
as 5:2018cv00467
Plaintiff:
Michael A Campbell
Defendant:
Nikki Gillespie, Greg Jones, Kealey Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uballe v. Ector County Law Enforcement Center Staff, et al
as 7:2017cv00144
Defendant:
Jailer Angie Abalos, Lt. J. Abalos, LVN Beverly Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Robert David Uballe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinds v. Knighton et al
as 5:2016cv01468
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hinds
Defendant:
FNU Knighton, Raymond Byrd and FNU Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Doe et al
as 5:2016cv00689
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Jane Doe, FNU Terralonge, Kimberly Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montalban v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jose Montalban
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., FNU Schultz, Tamyra Jarvis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murby v. Bailey et al
as 5:2016cv00230
Plaintiff:
Thomas Murby, Jr
Defendant:
Melinda Bailey, Theresa Sellers, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schorovsky v. Green et al
as 5:2016cv00068
Defendant:
Lt. FNU Ablos, FNU Caswell, FNU Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Robert George Schorovsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schorovsky v. Green et al
as 7:2016cv00033
Defendant:
Lt. FNU Ablos, FNU Caswell, FNU Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Robert George Schorovsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Miller et al
as 5:2015cv00397
Plaintiff:
Adrian DesJuan Bishop
Defendant:
Chad Miller, FNU Wesson, FNU Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
