Cases 21 - 30 of 253
Hranek, et al v. State of Florida Office of the State Attorney et al
as 3:2021cv01136
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Hranek and E. H. Consolidated
Defendant:
State of Florida Office of the State Attorney, Melissa Nelson, Terrence Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamfu v. Martin et al
as 8:2021cv02555
Plaintiff:
Charles Tamfu
Defendant:
Jessica Martin and Monika Nagy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2021cv14415
Plaintiff:
Francisco Hernandez
Defendant:
State of Florida, Mark S. Inch and Martin Correctional Institution Medical Dept. Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamfu v. Martin et al
as 8:2021cv02343
Plaintiff:
Charles Tamfu
Defendant:
Jessica Martin, Monika Nagy, Melissa Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLINE v. MAIORANA et al
as 3:2021cv01006
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALAN KLINE
Defendant:
C MAIORANA, M MONSALUD and LT MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Martin
as 3:2021cv00808
Plaintiff:
Ernest Judge Smith, III
Defendant:
Terence Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manord v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2021cv14312
Plaintiff:
Johnny J. Manord
Defendant:
State of Florida, State Attorney Office Prosecutor, 19th Judicial Circuit of Martin County FLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. Bennets
as 2:2021cv14273
Plaintiff:
Jesus Martin Soto
Defendant:
Officer Bennets
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Martin CI et al
as 2:2021cv14198
Defendant:
Martin Corr Inst. Ast Warden, Martin Corr Inst. Warden and Martin CI
Plaintiff:
Michael Liveal Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mirucki v. Martin County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2021cv14193
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Steven Craig Cranmer, Armor Correctional Health, Inc., Martin County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Mirucki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
