Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Pittman v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2010cv01085
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
A Sanchez, Robert Hernandez, . and Jary Sandor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Espino et al
as 3:2010cv00908
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
Espino, V Aguirrie, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2010cv00629
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
Attorney General, V Aguirrie and Robert Hernandez, .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. The Attorney General et al
as 3:2010cv00628
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
The Attorney General, Robert Hernandez, . and Tome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Aguirrie et al
as 3:2010cv00627
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
V Aguirrie, Robert Hernandez, . and The Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricardo Lanier v. Robert Hernandez, et al
as 09-56993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO EDWIN LANIER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HERNANDEZ, Warden, A. L. COTA, Associate Warden, K. SPENCE, Lieutenant and others
Gregory Gray v. John Doe, et al
as 09-56906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY LEE GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Director of CDCR, ROBERT HERNANDEZ, Warden at RJ Donovan Prison, E MARRERO, Captain of Facility 3 Yard and others
Pittman v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2009cv02407
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
Robert Hernandez and T Trezevant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hon Lau v. Robert Hernandez, et al
as 09-56315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HON CHUNG LAU
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HERNANDEZ, Warden and GRAHAM, Prison Guard
Jeff Gough-Adshima v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-56279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFF S. GOUGH-ADSHIMA
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, ROBERT L. TILLMAN, CDC/BPH Director, ROBERT HERNANDEZ, Warden, Donovan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
