Cases 31 - 40 of 662
Howard v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Jason Howard
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. N.H. County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Darnell Walker
Defendant:
N.H. County Jail, District Administrator, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oh v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Bamm Oh
Defendant:
Angel Quiros and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01332
Plaintiff:
Rashod Akeem Newton
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolterstorff v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Robert Munro Wolterstorff III and Robert Munro Wolterstorff, III
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Guadarrama, McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway et al v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Taveras, Christopher Q. Petteway, Christopher Deveau and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Craig Washington, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Charles et al
as 3:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
Earl Bradley
Defendant:
Sandra Charles, Doe, Byron Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morales
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, John Doe and Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baltas v. Hardy et al
as 3:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Defendant:
Gail P. Hardy, Mathew C. Gedansky, James R. Turcotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tobey v. Brisson et al
as 3:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tobey
Defendant:
Robin Brisson, Bridget A Nordstrom, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
