Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Woody et al v. Couch et al
as 2:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Thomas Franklin Woody, Monica Thomas Holder, Imani Robertson and others
Defendant:
Gerald Couch, Matt Gaudio, Steve Cronic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Hunter et al
as 4:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Clay
Defendant:
Robert Wadkins, Rachelle Hunter, S Ziegler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pierce v. Hall County Jail et al
as 2:2008cv00249
Plaintiff:
Douglas Leonard Pierce
Defendant:
Hall County Jail and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelsey v. Pierce et al
as 4:2008cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kameron Bernard Kelsey
Defendant:
Linda Pierce and Bobby Peters
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kelsey v. Pierce et al
as 1:2008cv03719
Plaintiff:
Kameron Kelsey
Defendant:
Linda Pierce and Bobby C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelsey v. Pierce et al
as 1:2008cv03651
Plaintiff:
Kameron Kelsey
Defendant:
Linda Pierce and Bobby C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Smith et al
as 1:2008cv02919
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Clay
Defendant:
Hugh Smith, James Donald, Rachelle Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Adelman et al
as 4:2008cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Boyd
Defendant:
David Adelman, John D. Allen, John Gray Conger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Salas v. Muscogee County et al
as 4:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
Zackary Kaleokalani Salas
Defendant:
M. Linda Pierce, Bobby Russell, Alonzo Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. County of Forsyth, Georgia et al
as 2:2007cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Williams
Defendant:
County of Forsyth, Georgia, Ted Paxton, Penny Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
