Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Grigsby v. Collins et al
as 3:2010cv02205
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Grigsby, Jr.
Defendant:
Terry Collins, Ernie Moore, Gary Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown, Jr. v. Harwood et al
as 2:2010cv00880
Plaintiff:
Frank C. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Gilbert A. Harwood, Kim A. Chapman, Jeff Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphrey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00844
Plaintiff:
James Humphrey
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Ernie Moore, Robin Knab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin Robinson v. Department of Rehabilitation a, et al
as 10-4067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION and ERNIE MOORE, Warden
Griffin v. Kyle et al
as 2:2010cv00664
Plaintiff:
Thomas Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Kyle, Hammond, Russell Beabout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 1:2010cv01346
Plaintiff:
James D. Banks
Defendant:
Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and Ernie Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sansom v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2010cv01076
Plaintiff:
Robert Sansom
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Ernie Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00973
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robinson
Defendant:
Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections and Ernie Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard et al v. Moore et al
as 2:2010cv00347
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Leonard and Cole Worthington
Defendant:
Ernie Moore and Gary Croft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Parker et al
as 4:2010cv00495
Plaintiff:
David E. Clark
Defendant:
J. Parker, Sgt. Kleinknecht, Mr. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
