Cases 31 - 40 of 144
ALEXANDER v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, "EECF" et al
as 2:2021cv04580
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, CFG MEDICAL SERVICES, MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF ESSEX COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAIG v. JOHN AND JANE DOE et al
as 2:2021cv02183
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CRAIG
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY WARDEN and JOHN AND JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2021cv01025
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #3 CORRECTIONAL OFFICER(S), ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN DOE #1 FOOD POLICYMAKER and others
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELTON v. ESSEX COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT, et al.
as 2:2020cv13344
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, BUREAU OF NARCOTICS and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP BELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HESTER v. ESSEX COUNTY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2020cv12467
Plaintiff:
MELVIN HESTER
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY POLICE DEPT. and ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. ESSEX COUNTY
as 2:2020cv10333
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv04718
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SGT. GUIDO, DR. LIONEL ANICETTE and others
Plaintiff:
ROSS W. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ESSEX COUNTY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2020cv01903
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ECHEVARRIA v. ESSEX COUNTY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv00498
Plaintiff:
MOISES ECHEVARRIA
Defendant:
G.I.L BANE & CO and ESSEX COUNTY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BROWN v. ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2019cv21249
Plaintiff:
ROSS WILLIAM BROWN
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
