Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Bartnick v. Ludwick et al
as 4:2016cv00578
Plaintiff:
Michael A Bartnick
Defendant:
Nick Ludwick, William Sperfslage, Rebecca Bowker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Helmick et al
as 4:2016cv00498
Plaintiff:
Frederick Douglas Armstrong
Defendant:
David Helmick, Jay Nelson and Jerry Bartruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v Bartruff, et al
as 4:2016cv00488
Plaintiff:
Duane Wright
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Nick Ludwick and Mike Schierbrock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, et al v. Ludwick et al
as 4:2016cv00460
Defendant:
Nick Ludwick, William Sperfslage, Mark Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Terry J Williams and Michael A Bartnick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grams v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2016cv00260
Plaintiff:
Jessie Thomas Grams
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Jim McKinney, Greg Ort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. Classification Committee for IDOC, IMCC et al
as 4:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
Jamesen John Cameron
Defendant:
Classification Committee for IDOC, IMCC, Jerry Bartruff, Diann Wilder-Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whipp et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00280
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Whipp
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Greg Ort and Judy Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hamby
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Jerry Bartruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Arnzen, III v. Superintendent John Baldwin, et al
as 15-2706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John W. Arnzen, III
Plaintiff:
Cory West, Danny Roe, David Whetstone and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent John R. Baldwin, Gail Huckins, Jill Hubbard and others
Bitzan et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00219
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan and Cassandra Zent
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Sheryl Dahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
