Cases 31 - 40 of 250
Daise v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Travis Daise
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levesque v. Clinton County Jail et al
as 9:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
Clinton County Jail and John/Jane Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. John/Jane Does #1-4
as 1:2021cv10823
Plaintiff:
Annibal Arroyo
Defendant:
John/Jane Does #1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimsley v. Nike Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10745
Plaintiff:
Robert Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Corp., Phil Knight doing business as Nike Corp., Amazon Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greathouse v. Meddaugh et al
as 9:2021cv01223
Plaintiff:
Leon Greathouse
Defendant:
Sgt. K. Meddaugh, RN Mary Thompson, Officer Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Encarnacion v. Noeth et al
as 6:2021cv06665
Plaintiff:
Bernabe Encarnacion
Defendant:
Joseph Noeth, Ensel, D.D. Shanahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Encarnacion v. Collado et al
as 9:2021cv00986
Plaintiff:
Bernabe Encarnacion
Defendant:
J. Collado, Anthony Annucci, A. Polizzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fullewellen v. City of New York
as 1:2021cv07219
Plaintiff:
Larry Fullewellen
Defendant:
City of New York and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ejimadu v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2021cv06544
Plaintiff:
Catherine I Ejimadu
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department and Officers John/Jane Does #1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunn v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2021cv00905
Plaintiff:
Robert Dunn
Defendant:
State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Schadel, Tacti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
