Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Guillory v. Livingston et al
as 5:2007cv00532
Plaintiff:
Glenn W. Guillory, Jr.
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Nathaniel A. Quarterman, Raynaldo Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Owens et al
as 6:2007cv00131
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kelly
Defendant:
Rissie L. Owens, Jose Aliseda, Charles Aycock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2007cv00094
Plaintiff:
Johnny E. McGee, Jr.
Defendant:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman, A. D. Caskey, Paul Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2007cv00077
Plaintiff:
Dennis Smith
Defendant:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman, Director of UTMB, Dawn Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2007cv00069
Plaintiff:
Eddie Eugene Brewer
Defendant:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman, George Stephenson and David A. Hortman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Rickoff et al
as 5:2007cv00167
Plaintiff:
Otha Thompson
Defendant:
Tom Rickhoff and Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2007cv00026
Plaintiff:
Chris White
Defendant:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman, Dawn Grounds, E. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soria v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2007cv00019
Petitioner:
Lisa Ann Soria
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman and FNU Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Truelove v. Quarterman
as 6:2007cv00015
Petitioner:
Faron Ray Truelove
Defendant:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Respondent:
Rissie Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Quarterman
as 6:2007cv00002
Plaintiff:
Gail Smith
Defendant:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
