Cases 31 - 40 of 40
REEVES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SCOTT REEVES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATF/FBI AGENTS KNOWN AND UNKNOWN, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STILE v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 2:2014cv00406
Plaintiff:
JAMES STILE
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF, BRETON, DARLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDWICK v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2014cv00387
Plaintiff:
ZACHARIAH HARDWICK
Defendant:
ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY JAIL and ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2014cv00299
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A FISHER
Defendant:
AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL, AROOSTOOK COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT and PETER DUFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SICILIANI v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, et al
as 2:2014cv00163
Plaintiff:
JOHN SICILIANI
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL and SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. OXFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 1:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
JASON M BROWN
Defendant:
OXFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STILE v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2012cv00163
Plaintiff:
JAMES STILE
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JOYCE, GAGNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIDI v. JUSTICE, US DEPT OF et al
as 1:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
DAVID J WIDI, JR
Defendant:
JUSTICE, US DEPT OF, US ATTORNEY EXECUTIVE OFFICE, THOMAS E DELAHANTY, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUBOIS v. WALDO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2008cv00096
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR DUBOIS
Defendant:
WALDO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WALDO COUNTY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and PAM, NURSE DOCTOR
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DARDENO v. YORK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2007cv00078
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS DARDENO
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY JAIL , YORK COUNTY SHERIFF and YORK COUNTY EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
