Cases 41 - 50 of 136
JONES v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2018cv10189
Plaintiff:
RICCO N. JONES
Defendant:
MATTHEW MURPHY, MATTHEW KATZENBACH, ROBERT REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANGO v. BERGEN COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATOR et al
as 2:2018cv10151
Petitioner:
EUGENY CANGO
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATOR, BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICERS, JOHN DOES 1-13 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2018cv05570
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SANDERS
Defendant:
N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD, COMBS, STEPHEN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. NEW JERSEY PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2018cv03752
Plaintiff:
GOLDA HARRIS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY PAROLE BOARD, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SARAH DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. NJ DOC CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION et al
as 3:2018cv01454
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
NJ DOC CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION, IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, M.D., JAMES K. LIU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DOFFONT et al
as 2:2017cv03685
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN JONES
Defendant:
SAMANTHA DOFFONT and EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETTY v. JONES et al
as 1:2017cv02967
Plaintiff:
JULIAN PETTY
Defendant:
JOHN JONES, TYEFA WORTHY, PRATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. OWENS et al
as 1:2017cv02634
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. JONES
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS and KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. PALONI et al
as 3:2017cv01949
Plaintiff:
RUBEN JONES
Defendant:
STEVEN PALONI, M.D., HELMI SAUD DO, M.D., SCOTT D. MILLER, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. NASTASI et al
as 3:2016cv09521
Plaintiff:
LA'SHAWN JONES
Defendant:
PETER NASTASI and PROSECUTORS OFFICE NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
