Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Boyd v. Price et al
as 2:2010cv02447
Petitioner:
Cedric Boyd
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winborn v. Price et al
as 7:2010cv02106
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Winborn
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Dewayne Estes and J Whitley
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Price et al
as 7:2010cv02053
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jon Guy
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Crum, Hutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Price et al
as 7:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mathis
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Miller, Lawston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McManus v. State of Alabama, The et al
as 7:2009cv01664
Plaintiff:
Peter Charles McManus
Defendant:
State of Alabama, The, Alabama Department of Corrections, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Freeman et al
as 7:2009cv01600
Plaintiff:
William Elder Sullivan
Defendant:
Freddie Freeman, Cheryl Price, Dwayne Esteese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Freeman et al
as 7:2009cv01605
Plaintiff:
Donnie Smith
Defendant:
Freddie Freeman, Cheryl Price, Dwayne Esteese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dee v. Freeman et al
as 7:2009cv01602
Plaintiff:
Angelo Yatzie Dee
Defendant:
Freddie Freeman, Cheryl Price, Dwayne Esteese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racer v. Freeman et al
as 7:2009cv01601
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Racer
Defendant:
Freddie Freeman, Cheryl Price, Dwayne Esteese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCrary v. Freeman et al
as 7:2009cv01603
Plaintiff:
Vernon McCrary
Defendant:
Freddie Freeman, Cheryl Price, Dwayne Esteese and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
