Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Nave v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00673
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Nave
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Rick Kearney, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Jackson, III v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 11-9002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT W. JACKSON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS L. CARROLL, Warden Delaware Correctional Center, CARL C. DANBERG, PAUL HOWARD, Bureau Chief Delaware Bureau of Prisons and others
Robert Jackson, III v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 11-9000
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT W. JACKSON, III
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner, Delaware Department of Correction, THOMAS L. CARROLL, Warden Delaware Correctional Center, PAUL HOWARD, Bureau Chief, Delaware Bureau of Prisons and others
Rhoades v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00589
Plaintiff:
Tia Rhoades
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burroughs v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jessica L. Burroughs
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valentine v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00524
Plaintiff:
Anthony Valentine
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Perry Phelps and Mike Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Gile et al
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
George Gile, Mark D. Daum, Marcili Rispoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merillo v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00333
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, James Scarborough and others
Plaintiff:
Carlo Merillo, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waples v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Joshua Waples
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Spence Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Sherrhonda L. Williams
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carter, Michael Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
