Cases 41 - 50 of 109
Evans v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Evans
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Victor Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bennett
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Victor Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yelverton v. Walker et al
as 1:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
James Toxie Yelverton, III
Defendant:
Walker, Burke, M.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Turner et al
as 1:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Travis Banks
Defendant:
Marshal Turner, Jane Doe and Other Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weathington v. Clark et al
as 4:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jerome Weathington
Defendant:
Donovan Clark, Jonathan Brewer, Jeremy Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Turner et al
as 1:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Travis Banks
Defendant:
Marshal Turner, Jane Doe and Other Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Morris et al
as 4:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Defendant:
Norris Morris, Steven Pickett, Clarnce Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davenport et al
as 3:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Torey Cortez Smith
Defendant:
Cully Davenport, Dexter Gates, Chip Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. DeSoto County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wood
Defendant:
DeSoto County Sheriff's Department, Bill Rasco, Chad Wicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torns et al v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Charles Torns, Jr. and Marilyn L. Torns
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Madison County Supervisors, Randy Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
