Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Johnson v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2012cv01580
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Johnson
Defendant:
DOCCS, Inspector General Agency, NY State Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dettelis v. Reardon et al
as 1:2012cv00786
Defendant:
Michael F. Reardon , Timothy B. Howard , Kathryn D'Angelo and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dettelis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 7:2012cv06335
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Rodriguez
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, New York Correct Care Solutions Medical Services, P.C., Westchester County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bilal v. Fischer et al
as 1:2012cv05144
Plaintiff:
Shateek Amin Bilal
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Kenneth S. Perlman, Lucien LeClaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilbert v. Fischer et al
as 7:2012cv03843
Plaintiff:
Stanley Hilbert
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, William Lee, M. Surpremant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Hilbert et al
as 1:2012cv03843
Plaintiff:
Stanley Hilbert
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, William Lee, M. Surpremant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutphen v. The County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2011cv01977
Defendant:
Jane Doe 3-10, Sergeant Lowry, George Lynn and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Sutphen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Beebee et al
as 9:2010cv01030
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Beebee, Norman Bezio, Carpentar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Doe #1 et al
as 9:2009cv01437
Plaintiff:
Lamonte Riley
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Rao et al
as 9:2008cv00612
Plaintiff:
John Hale
Defendant:
Jadow Rao, J. Ireland, Mack /s/ Revell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
