Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Richard A Roy v. Agents of Defendants CA Dept of Corr et al
as 2:2011cv06844
Defendant:
Agents of Defendants CA Dept of Corr, CA Board of Prison Hearings, CA Dept of Corr and Rehab Adult Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Richard A Roy
R. Wayne Johnson v. Robert Perry et al
as 2:2011cv01560
Defendant:
Elden Fox, John-Jane Does and Robert Perry
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Vance Blaine v. Lesley Klein et al
as 2:2010cv09038
Plaintiff:
Vance Blaine
Defendant:
Compton Police Department, John & Jane Does 1-50, Compton Police Department, John & Jane Does 1-50, John and Jane Doe of 5 Unknown State DNA Laboratory and others
Outlaw v. John/Jane Doe 1-7
as 1:2010cv01021
Plaintiff:
Lee Outlaw
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Lawrence Snoke v. John/Jane Doe
as 2:2009cv03551
Plaintiff:
Brian Lawrence Snoke
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Demond Martin v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2008cv06292
Plaintiff:
Demond Martin
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Lee Baca and John Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Daniel James Trebas v. Robert Knapp et al
as 2:2008cv04809
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Trebas
Defendant:
Robert Knapp, David Fennell, Joan Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Paul v. Doe et al
as 1:2008cv01047
Plaintiff:
Duane Paul
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, John/Jane Doe and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armando Miramon v. Lee Baca et al
as 2:2008cv01740
Plaintiff:
Armando Miramon
Defendant:
Lee Baca, Los Angeles County Sheriff and John & Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Ronald Woods v. California Rehabilitation Center (CDCR) et al
as 5:2008cv00340
Plaintiff:
Ronald Woods
Defendant:
California Rehabilitation Center (CDCR) and John & Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
