Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Cotton v. Noeth et al
as 1:2018cv01426
Defendant:
S. DeGroat, T. Barber, Anne Marie McGrath and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burroughs v. Smithers et al
as 6:2018cv06853
Defendant:
Bethany J. Viscuso, Lawrence X. Dalton, Christopher R. Haff and others
Plaintiff:
Lorcen Burroughs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Koenigsmann et al
as 6:2018cv06684
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Deborah Bunning, Robert Schallinger and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Ghaffaar McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dove v. Noeth et al
as 6:2018cv06515
Defendant:
Inmate Accounts, Joseph H. Noeth and Deputy Superintendent; Programs
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Dove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dove v. Noeth et al
as 1:2018cv00760
Defendant:
Inmate Accounts, Deputy Superintendent; Programs, Superintendent Joseph H. Noeth and others
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Dove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. McJury et al
as 6:2018cv06498
Defendant:
C.O. R. McJury, S.O.R.C. Spink, Superintendent J. Noeth and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Annucci
as 18-1807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald McFadden, AKA Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jr. Acting Commissioner; DOCCS, Maureen Boll, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel; DOCCS, Jeff McKoy, Deputy Commissioner of Programs; DOCCS and others
McLean v. Putnam et al
as 6:2018cv06097
Plaintiff:
Bahsid McLean
Defendant:
Tommy Putnam, Mitchell and Joseph Noeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Hembrook
as 6:2018cv06091
Plaintiff:
Michael Joshua Henderson
Defendant:
Brian Hembrook, Abboit, Reginald Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jonathan B. Nunez
Defendant:
The State of New York, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
