Cases 41 - 50 of 78
JONES v. SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 4:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY B JONES
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT and Public Defenders Office of Muscogee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rufus v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv03869
Plaintiff:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Samuel D. Ozburn, Public Defender Office of the Alcovy Judicial Circuit and others
Lewis v. Kellner et al
as 1:2012cv03871
Plaintiff:
Henry Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
William M Kellner, Barbara Harris, Prosecuting Attorney and others
Lewis v. Kellner et al
as 3:2012cv00158
Plaintiff:
Henry Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
William M Kellner, Barbara Harris, Prosecuting Attorney and others
Shaw v. Henry County Drug Court Program et al
as 1:2012cv03742
Plaintiff:
Micha Raynell Shaw
Defendant:
Henry County Drug Court Program, Flint Circuit Public Defenders Office, McDonough Probation and others
Davis v. Public Defenders Office
as 4:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Lacinda Ann Davis
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Georgia Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Georgia Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Movant:
James E. Harris, Jamall D. Mathis, Antonio Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Pilgrim et al
as 3:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Douglas Barber, Jr.
Defendant:
Mac Pilgrim and Carroll County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dollar v. Cauble et al
as 3:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
Wesley Eugene Dollar
Defendant:
Charles B. Cauble, Newnan Public Defender's Office and Coweta County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Public Defender Office et al
as 2:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ervin Singleton
Defendant:
Public Defender Office, Glynn County and Chad Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
