Cases 41 - 50 of 162
Young v. Sessions et al
as 2:2018cv00700
Defendant:
United States, US Attorney, Southern District Ohio, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. United States Federal Government et al
as 1:2018cv00419
Plaintiff:
James Jamison
Defendant:
United States Federal Government, Jessica Knight and Jeffery B Sessions, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Furmon et al
as 1:2018cv00400
Defendant:
Janel McBain, Commissioner Charles Furmon, John Paul Reiser and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Carter, r
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallivan v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00545
Plaintiff:
Dennis Gallivan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Raymond Tate
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palermo v. United States Marshals et al
as 4:2018cv00246
Plaintiff:
Robert Palermo
Defendant:
United States Marshals, United States of America and Paul J. Vacca, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pringle v. Government Office of Cuyahoga County Ohio Prosecution et al
as 1:2017cv02425
Plaintiff:
Roger Pringle
Defendant:
Government Office of Cuyahoga County Ohio Prosecution and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. Captain Conley et al
as 4:2017cv01546
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Captain Conley, United States Marshal, Warden Larose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 2:2017cv00628
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Cocas et al
as 4:2017cv01512
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Donovan Cocas, Adrian N. Roe, McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
