Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Sanchez v. United States of America et al
as 6:2010cv00054
Petitioner:
Samuel Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America, Michelle T. Fuseyamore, Mrs. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Wardrick v. State of Kentucky et al
as 6:2010cv00050
Petitioner:
Robert Wardrick
Respondent:
State of Kentucky, County of McCreary and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Little v. United States of America
as 7:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Vayashanez Little
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vesseghi v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00386
Plaintiff:
Ben Vesseghi
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FMC-Lexington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Cunningham
as 6:2009cv00373
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cunningham
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Browne v. United States of America
as 0:2009mc00094
Petitioner:
Roger A. Browne
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Browne v. United States of America
as 0:2009cv00094
Petitioner:
Roger A. Browne
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rose v. United States of America
as 7:2009cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jason Rose
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cole v. United States of America
as 6:2009cv00212
Petitioner:
Robert E. Cole
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Borders v. United States of America
as 6:2009cv00203
Petitioner:
Jerome Lee Borders
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
