Cases 51 - 60 of 702
Carruth v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Terrence Carruth
Defendant:
John Doe, Jimmy Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
KERRY S MITCHELL
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, WARDEN CHARLES MIMMS, LIEUTENANT ROSEVELT GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN POWELL
Defendant:
COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REH FAC et al
as 5:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REH FAC and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REH FAC ET
as 5:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REH FAC ET and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v.JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
as 5:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
LANORRIS MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 1:2023cv02495
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
William, Sgt. Atkins, Ct. L. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webber v. Fort et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert Webber
Defendant:
Karl Fort, Georgia Department of Corrections, Georgia Board of Regents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pitt v. City of Fairburn, GA et al
as 1:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
Myron Pitt
Defendant:
City of Fairburn, GA, Officer John Doe and Fairburn Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. U.S. ATTY OFF et al
as 5:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
SAMMY LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
U.S. ATTY OFF, CSH DR. ZSAFR, NURSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
