Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Howard v. Georgia Pardons and Parole Bd. Members et al
as 1:2013cv02586
Plaintiff:
Roderick Howard
Defendant:
Georgia Pardons and Parole Bd. Members and Marla Blackmon
Mathis v. Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles et al
as 1:2013cv01863
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wayne Mathis
Defendant:
Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles and James Donald
Harris v. Department of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2013cv01524
Plaintiff:
Ian Dwight Harris
Defendant:
Department of Pardons and Paroles
Hamilton v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2012cv03745
Plaintiff:
Roland Paul Hamilton
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Dawud v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2012cv02928
Plaintiff:
Wali Malik Dawud
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton et al v. State Bar of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv01501
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Burton
Defendant:
State Bar of Georgia, Paula J. Frederick, John J. Shiptenko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, Pardons and Parole Division
as 1:2012cv01248
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Pardons and Parole Division
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Henderson et al
as 1:2011cv04180
Plaintiff:
Fabian LaGerald Andre Allen
Defendant:
Thurman Henderson and Entire Board of Pardon & Consideration, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. State Board of Pardons and Parole, State of Georgia
as 1:2011cv03919
Plaintiff:
Levon Victor Bell
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Parole, State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. JACKSON COUNTY PRISON et al
as 3:2011cv00165
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY PRISON, Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles, Supreme Court of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
