Cases 61 - 70 of 132
Kimble v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bouvia Kimble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2019cv00583
Defendant:
Dr Lannette Linthicum, Tommy L Norwood, Dr. Marcia J Odal and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Lorie Davis, Director of TDCJ-CID
as 5:2019cv00041
Petitioner:
Salvador Jimenez, III
Respondent:
Greg Abbott and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, et al
as 4:2019cv00107
Plaintiff:
Roderick Sherrod Johnson
Defendant:
G. Parker, M. Alsobrook, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willin v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2019cv00009
Plaintiff:
Brian Bernard Willin
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2019cv00183
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gilbert
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumsden et al v. Davis et al
as 5:2019cv00025
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mayreis, Jason Hendershott, Raymond Lumsden and others
Defendant:
Ronald Givens, Asst Warden FNU Steigel, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2019cv00066
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Pardons and Paroles Board of the Eastern Tx Division, NFN Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2019cv00001
Petitioner:
Antonio Dudley
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumsden et al v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv00049
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mayreis, Jason Hendershott, Raymond Lumsden and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Ronald Givens and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
