Cases 61 - 70 of 654
MORRELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Morrell
Defendant:
United States of America and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMPTON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
PAUL CHANDLER HAMPTON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
D'Mante Dontrell Anderson
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. The State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
State of Georgia, DeKalb County Jail and DeKalb County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L MORRELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIFUENTES v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
GERARDO ROEL SIFUENTES
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. GEORGIA et al
as 4:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, JULIA SLATER, Sheriff JEFF WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIFUENTES v STATE OF GEORGIA, et al
as 5:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
GERARDO ROEL SIFUENTES
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCURTY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
DREXEL MCCURTY
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, TIMOTHY C WARD, BRIAN P KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
