Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Bennett v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv02379
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Christie Thomas, Blake Pollock, Javin Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett V. Riverbend Trust Fund Dept.
as 3:2014cv02350
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Riverbend Trust Fund Dept., Ashley Demonbrun, Jane Lovell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. TN Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv02338
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Christie Thomas, Charles Carpenter, Tony Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv02191
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Christie Thomas, Marquis Osborne, James Yeldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2014cv02172
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Dotson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Wayne Carpenter, Candance Whisman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Jackson et al
as 3:2014cv02024
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
H. Jackson, TN Dept of Corrections Investigations/Compliance Unit, Terrence Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. R.M.S.I. Trust Fund Dept. et al
as 3:2014cv01691
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
R.M.S.I. Trust Fund Dept., Charles W. Carpenter, Caroline Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. TN Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv01692
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
TN Dept. of Corrections, (f/n/u) Mosley, Sandra Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbison v. Thompson
as 3:2014cv00409
Plaintiff:
Edward Jerome Harbison
Defendant:
Evelyn Thompson, Michael Bryant, Derrick D. Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cage v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2013cv01384
Plaintiff:
Quinton Albert Cage
Defendant:
Wayne Carpenter, Tony Mays, Derrick Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
