Cases 71 - 80 of 127
Tufono v. California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation Mule Creek State Prison et al
as 2:2009cv03372
Plaintiff:
Arvello L. Tufono
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation Mule Creek State Prison, M. Martel, G R Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Hrbacek et al
as 2:2009cv03251
Plaintiff:
Eugene E. Welch
Defendant:
Erika Hrbacek, Sherry West, D Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernando Aranda v. M. Martel, et al
as 09-17473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO ARANDA
Defendant - Appellee:
M. MARTEL and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Pittman v. Brown et al
as 3:2009cv02406
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
Frnaklin Brown, David J Danalsen, William H Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2009cv02410
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
William H Kennedy, Frnakin Brown and M Martel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Walker et al
as 2:2009cv02899
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Clay
Defendant:
J Walker, G Salas, G Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rex Chappell v. D. McCargar, et al
as 09-16984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REX CHAPPELL
Defendant - Appellee:
D. MCCARGAR, D. HOFFMAN, Supervisor of Academic Instruction, M. MARTEL, Captian and others
Nicolas Andreas v. James Yates, et al
as 09-16920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICOLAS DAVID ANDREAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES YATES, A. MILLS, P. MENDOZA and others
Parthemore v. Martel et al
as 2:2009cv02330
Plaintiff:
Ira Don Parthemore
Defendant:
M. Martel, Lonnie Jackson, M. Kaplan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Martel
as 2:2009cv02317
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
M. Martel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
