Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Brown v. Milwaukee County Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2016cv00632
Plaintiff:
Ennis Lee Brown
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Public Defenders Office , Mark Rosen, Jeremy Perri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conrod v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00620
Plaintiff:
Davius Conrod
Defendant:
Robert R Smith, Amy Stolowski and Milwaukee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Harms et al
as 2:2016cv00396
Plaintiff:
Breion S Woodson
Defendant:
Mark E Harms and Milwaukee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Pajot et al
as 2:2016cv00245
Plaintiff:
Eladio R Hernandez
Defendant:
Patrick Pajot, Officer Cappelli, Officer Delie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, James v. Pollard, William et al
as 3:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
James A. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
William Pollard , Waupun Corr. Insti., Brad D. Schimel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pantoja v. Haase et al
as 2:2015cv01368
Plaintiff:
Marcos L Pantoja
Defendant:
Glen Haase, Jason Baranek and Milwaukee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawthorne v. Streicher et al
as 2:2015cv01355
Plaintiff:
Phillip E Hawthorne
Defendant:
J Streicher and Milwaukee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Threadgill v. Milwaukee County Courthouse et al
as 1:2015cv01221
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Threadgill, III
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Courthouse and Meghan Lindberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson et al v. Milwaukee County District Attorney et al
as 2:2015cv01066
Plaintiff:
Elijahwan Demond Wilson and Benjamin John Biese
Defendant:
Milwaukee County District Attorney and Randy Sitzberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hewing et al v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2015cv00753
Plaintiff:
Marqueal Hewing and Antwan Bogan
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Milwaukee County Judiciary System, Edward A Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
