Cases 71 - 80 of 5,103
Hayes v. Barthuly et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Harold Eugene Hayes
Defendant:
Brad Barthuly, Devin Nielsen, Alysta Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattox v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Mattox
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Damrell v. Richmond PD et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Derick Damrell
Defendant:
Richmond PD, Richmond Sheriffs Department and Madison County DPA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Adams et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
(Officer) Dylan Adams, (Officer) Gregory A. Stokes, (Officer) Dylan T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Logan County Detention Center Jail
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Steve D. Roberson
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. McCalister et al
as 5:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Robin McCalister, Allyson Lambert, Laura Plappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitlow v. Boyce et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Terrell E. Whitlow
Defendant:
Jennifer Boyce, David Fernandez, Beth Lessey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Beard et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jessica Beard, Damon Preston and Mr. Kenny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitlow v. Boyce et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Terrell E. Whitlow
Defendant:
Jennifer Boyce, David Fernandez, Beth Lessey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Collins
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Lee Marcell Campbell
Defendant:
Director Jerry Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
