Cases 1 - 10 of 7,994
WILKINS v. DEGNER
as 1:2024cv06999
Plaintiff:
KHALIL WILKINS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DEGNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CELENTANO v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06998
Plaintiff:
RALPH CELENTANO
Defendant:
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, WARDEN R. THOMPSON, DR. SOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAHID v. VAZQUEZ et al
as 1:2024cv06997
Plaintiff:
GARY SHAHID and Stanley Gary Thompson
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL VAZQUEZ, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE FOR NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BANGO v. MASSING et al
as 1:2024cv06937
Plaintiff:
NOEL K. BANGO
Defendant:
MATTHEW MASSING, BRIAN HANSEN and TIMOTHY PARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CELANO v. CUZZUPE et al
as 1:2024cv06954
Plaintiff:
LEE-ANTHONY CELANO
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN CUZZUPE and NURSE JENNINE MECHOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VEGA v. CALDERON et al
as 2:2024cv06905
Plaintiff:
MARIO VEGA
Defendant:
MARIA CALDERON and VICTORIA KUHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MCGILL et al
as 2:2024cv06910
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
PATRICIA MCGILL, P. REX, MARIO VIERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06864
Plaintiff:
KEITH E. MEARS
Defendant:
C/O SMITH and WARDEN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERNER v. SCOTT
as 2:2024cv06865
Plaintiff:
DYLAN BERNER
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2024cv06674
Plaintiff:
JASON FLORES
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, BECKY SCOTT and OFC. JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
