Cases 1 - 10 of 39
BAKER v. SGT. ADAMS et al
as 3:2022cv05624
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BAKER
Defendant:
SGT. ADAMS, OFC. PEPE, OFC. GILLEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. ROYCE et al
as 3:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
RAK RALPH BAKER
Defendant:
RAYMOND ROYCE, MARSHAL FLETCHER, MICHAEL CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. BAKER et al
as 2:2021cv16935
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLAN DIXON
Defendant:
SGT. CHRIS BAKER, LT. VINCENT BAKER and CAPTAIN JOHN ARTURI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEORGES v. GABRIEL et al
as 2:2020cv05803
Defendant:
CINDY SWEENEY, AHAB GABRIEL, BARRINGTON LYNCH and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Kane
as 1:2018cv03820
Plaintiff:
John David Baker
Defendant:
THOMAS KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. CAMARILLO et al
as 3:2017cv12095
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BAKER
Defendant:
JOY CAMARILLO, IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KEARNEY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01988
Plaintiff:
LAQUAN L KEARNEY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RODRIGUEZ, R BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTERLING v. THE CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv04463
Plaintiff:
DONALD EASTERLING
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, THE NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VALDEZ v. SCHILLARI et al
as 2:2016cv02943
Plaintiff:
DAVID VALDEZ
Defendant:
FRANK X. SCHILLARI, (JANE-DOE) BAKER, HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S S.W.A.T. OFFICIALS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv02017
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS , EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON , PATRICK NOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
