Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Neff v. Walker et al
as 4:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Neff
Defendant:
Walker, Armel, Brittain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv04924
Plaintiff:
MS. KIMBERLY BROWN and KIMBERLY BROWN
Defendant:
MAYOR MAURICE CLARK, SR., OFFICER DONALD QUICK, OFFICER MICHAEL HALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Wetzel, et al
as 1:2021cv01828
Plaintiff:
Keith S. Brown
Defendant:
John Doe, Kathy Brittain, Tony Iannuzzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stuart v. Murray et al
as 1:2018cv00430
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Stuart
Defendant:
Kimberly Murray, Janice Hale, RN, Margaret Ward, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foye v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02478
Plaintiff:
Inell Foye
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Mark Hale, Patrick Cummiskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Corbett et al
as 3:2013cv02961
Plaintiff:
Kerry X Marshall
Defendant:
Tom Corbett, John Wetzel, John K. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALE v. UNION STATION BAR AND GRILL et al
as 5:2013cv04741
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY HALE
Defendant:
UNION STATION BAR AND GRILL, JIM CRESSWELL and MEGAN CRESSWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conklin v. Hale et al
as 4:2013cv00904
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Conklin
Defendant:
Hale, Brigger, Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. McMillen et al
as 3:2007cv01701
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Hale
Defendant:
McMillen, Lynn Eaton, Lt. Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv00345
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Hale
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Beard, Randall N. Sears, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
