Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH et al
as 5:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
EDWIN GEORGE PFURSICH, IV and CODY PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. EPFURSICH
as 5:2024cv01381
Plaintiff:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
JACQULYN EPFURSICH and JACQULYN E. PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Anglemeyer et al
as 1:2020cv01736
Defendant:
Jason Snyder and Richard Anglemeyer
Plaintiff:
Kashif M. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Bates et al
as 1:2014cv00846
Plaintiff:
Kashif M. Robertson
Defendant:
Darrin A. Bates, Nicholas Ishman and Joshua Hammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v Thomas
as 3:2014cv00264
Petitioner:
Marco Miguel Robertson
Receiver:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Samuels et al
as 3:2014cv00097
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr., Thomas and DOC Commissioner of MD
Plaintiff:
Marco Miguel Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robertson v. Executive Director Brain Institute Geisinger Medical Center
as 3:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Marco Miguel Robertson
Defendant:
Executive Director Brain Institute Geisinger Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robertson v. Samuels et al
as 3:2013cv02500
Plaintiff:
Marco Miguel Robertson
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr., J.E. Thomas and Kevin L Pigos, Dr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West v. County of York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2012cv01564
Plaintiff:
Israel West
Defendant:
County of York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, York County Prison, Mary Sabol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2012cv01507
Plaintiff:
Jacob Martin
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Lackawanna County Treatment Court, Lackawanna County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
