Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Burrell v. Bishop et al
as 9:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Bishop, Locke, Conto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Bishop et al
as 9:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Reginald Bishop, Hill, Vesenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
DOCCS, Anthony Annucci, Central Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houtar et al v. United States Government et al
as 9:2020cv00708
Defendant:
S. Lovett, United States Government and Mr. Hastings
Plaintiff:
Amin Wadley and Mahyoub Molhi Mo Houtar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Hochul et al
as 1:2013cv01106
Plaintiff:
Brian Avery Smith
Defendant:
William J. Hochul, Jr., Maura K. O'Donnell, Richard Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-Hanafi v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2013cv02072
Plaintiff:
Wesam El-Hanafi
Defendant:
United States Of America, Sean Cooper, Daniel Withers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Lewis et al
as 9:2011cv01453
Plaintiff:
Michael Aziz Zeref Shabazz
Defendant:
David L. Lewis, James Patterson, John Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Bellnier et al
as 9:2011cv01447
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
Joseph Bellnier, Michael Sheahan, Donald Uhler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 9:2011cv01232
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Albert Brook, Gerald J. Otis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salemo v. Hasting et al
as 1:2011cv02525
Plaintiff:
George Salemo
Defendant:
Hasting, United States Marshalls Service SDNY, Maureen Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
