Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Dillard v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard
Defendant:
Collado Scarborough, Sarah Angol, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Blades et al
as 3:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Darin Lee Jones
Defendant:
Blades and Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Darin Lee Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Lorance and Halgum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tholson v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Leon Tholson
Defendant:
B.A. Jones, S. Nelson and State of Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slaikeu v. Masse et al
as 3:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Alexander Slaikeu
Defendant:
Masse, Jones, Titus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Irvin et al
as 3:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard
Defendant:
Andrew Irvin, Brandon Jones, Robert G. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slaikeu v. Alaska Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Slaikeu
Defendant:
Alaska Dept. of Corrections, Hamlton, Bundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reclaim Lee Roy Jefferey Stansberry et al v. Refiled Alaska Court Judge Timothy M. Burgess et al
as 3:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
Natasha Taylor, ACLU, OVR DA, Reclaim Lee Roy Jefferey Stansberry and others
Defendant:
Goyis, Dunleavy, OPA Pall and others
Reclaim: Leroy Jeffrey Stansberry et al v. Refiled U.S Criminal Justice Dept Attorney General Ganlanc, etc et al
as 3:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Natasha, Darryl, Reclaim: Leroy Jeffrey Stansberry and others
Defendant:
OPA App FBI, Herman Jr. Walker, Refiled U.S Criminal Justice Dept Attorney General Ganlanc, etc and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
