Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Jones v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Gonzalez, Nordby, The Town of Newtown Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Grande et al
as 3:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Karen Grande and Janine Brennan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Blekis et al
as 3:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Blekis, Marcellin, Craig Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Beckert et al
as 3:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Beckert, Ross, Marcellin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Baran et al
as 3:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Baran, Bryant and Cabellero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Schortman et al
as 3:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Schortman, Harris, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scott Erfe, WIlliam Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Hartford et al
as 3:2022cv01462
Plaintiff:
Angelo Gibson
Defendant:
City of Hartford's Office of the Corporation Counsel, Omar Jones, Police Officer Rudomski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Parsons et al
as 3:2022cv01360
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moore
Defendant:
Ryan Parsons, Peter Pietraroia, Steven Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. McClendon et al
as 3:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Charles Young and Charles Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn McClendon and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
