Cases 1 - 10 of 87
MCGRATH v. BENTON et al
as 1:2023cv13006
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCGRATH, JR.
Defendant:
C.O. BENTON, C.O. HERNANDEZ, L.T. MARRUSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILFORD v. KOPISTEKI et al
as 1:2023cv04461
Plaintiff:
LEWIS MILFORD
Defendant:
J. KOPISTEKI, NURSE HENSAN, ADMINISTRATOR MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MARTIN v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
as 1:2023cv04160
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MARTIN
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGARTH v. TURNER et al
as 1:2023cv03933
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCGARTH
Defendant:
SIS TURNER, CASE MANAGER MCCOY, SIS VALASQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERCEDES v. IBENEME et al
as 2:2023cv03833
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO M MERCEDES
Defendant:
C. IBENEME, GROSSKOFF, RIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CUMBERLAND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MARTIN
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, EUGENE CALDWELL, III, OFFICER WELCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macias-Nevarez v. Friend
as 1:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jorge Enrique Macias-Nevarez
Defendant:
Martin Friend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAAR v. CFG HEALTH SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv07595
Plaintiff:
JEREMY MARTIN HAAR
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. DIMONTE et al
as 1:2022cv05528
Plaintiff:
JORGE GOMEZ
Defendant:
D.O. RICHARD DIMONTE, FOOD ADMINISTRATOR REDFORD and AHSA G. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WOOD v. MARTIN et al
as 3:2022cv02740
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WOOD
Defendant:
DR. MARTIN and DR. COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
